ITT we correct minor nuances of the previous post without regard for context (273)

1 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5052 06:27

In actuality, >>0 should be a link to http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1182180250/64.

224 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5087 20:54

>>223, you are regarding the previous poster's context, rather than correcting minor nuances. Nevertheless, changing the repeated use of "statements" to a synonym would make your second sentence more effective.

225 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5088 14:05

>>224
Posted at 20:54 and not 20:52

226 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5088 14:28

>>225
FRAGMENT!

227 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5088 16:48

>>226 Yelled in the chat room.

228 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5088 21:04

>>227 thinks this BBS is a chatroom.

229 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5088 23:17

>>228's use of "BBS" is verging on the anachronistic

230 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5089 13:06

I suspect >>229 meant archaic

231 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5090 07:24

>>230, you should punctuate your sentence to indicate the thought has been completely transcribed. At present, it looks like you accidentally submitted the form in the middle of typing.

232 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5092 04:22

>>231 ironically included punctuation, but neglected to fully complete the thought beforehand, leaving his post readable but still moderately awkward.

233 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5104 19:01

>>232 has a split infinitive. Although this is not technically against any hard-set rules of English grammar, it is frowned upon by most style guides.

234 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5104 20:22

>>233 I'd've written "it's" rather than "it is" if I were you.

235 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5104 21:09

>>234
I'd've?
English language professors would have a field day with that.

236 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5105 02:10

>>235
Seriously, though, professors are one silly bunch.

237 Name: TripcodeKiller!PYZX54X2L. : 1993-09-5105 06:01

>>236
Didn't correct anything in the previous post, but rather commented on it.

238 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5109 22:40

(L^ิցOิ)

239 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5111 01:37

>>238
Appears in many threads, but fails to contribute to any of those threads.

240 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5111 16:51

>>239 failed to realize that (L^ิցOิ) was merely being true to his nature.

241 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5113 03:28

>>240 failed to use a gender-neutral pronoun. (L^ิցOิ) could, in fact, be female, or neither, or both.

242 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5113 03:35

>>241 ignores that (L^ิցOิ) is actually called Left Parenthesis Acute Accent Circumflex Accent Combining Circumflex Accent Greek Small Letter Omega Fullwidth Circumflex Accent Combining Circumflex Accent Right Parenthesis.

243 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5113 03:40

>>242 doesn't seem to realize that no one cares what (L^ิցOิ) is called, because he is nothing more than an annoying retarded grandpa.

244 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5113 08:27

(L^ิցOิ) DddUUuUrRrrrRrR >>243 ID A FIG TAT GUTM. MIP WIS SOO KLEVRET

245 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5113 10:24

>>244 made numerous spelling errors.

246 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5113 12:43

>>245popo forgot to put -popo after >>244.

247 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5115 06:36

>>246 communicated a word and/or suffix not that I can not find in any standard English dictionary which raises the question of why this word was used at all.

248 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5115 18:20

>>247 needs, more, commas.

249 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5115 19:22

>>248 needs less commas

250 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5115 19:24

>>249 probably should have used "fewer", unless he meant the commas should have been smaller.

251 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5117 00:50

>>250 incorrectly placed the comma on the outside of the quotation mark.

252 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5117 03:55

>>251 is using American spelling rules. In British English for instance, punctuation is only placed within quotation marks if it is part of what is being quoted or referred to.

253 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5117 05:10

>>252 is a dirty limey and doesn't know how to speak his own language.

254 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5117 13:28

>>253 should have used all caps to emphasise his redneck roots.

255 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5117 16:33

>>254's use of "caps" in place of "capitals" somewhat undermines their point.

256 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5117 17:15

>>255
"his point". "their" is plural.

257 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5117 17:24

>>256 used no capital letters at all, even when beginning a new sentence.

258 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5117 19:07

>>257 Used no capital letters at all, even when beginning a new sentence.

259 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5117 19:30

>>258 just reused an awkward sentence convention. They also neglected to realise that ">>256" started the sentence in >>257; so by capitalising "used" in their correction, they were unknowingly in error.

260 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5117 20:30

>>259 spelled "realize" wrong.

261 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5117 20:54

>>259's usage of "realise" instead of "realize" on such an international message board reeks of nationalism.

262 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5117 20:58

>>261's faulty cache settings are a significant hindrance to signal-to-noise ratio of this debate.

263 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5117 22:23

>>262 "Debate"? When a teacher corrects the spelling errors of his student, he's not debating.

I'll leave as an exercise to the reader to find the proper wording.

264 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5117 23:20

>>263 used the transitive verb "leave" without supplying a direct object.

265 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5121 01:46

>>264 neglected to mention that he is a Panda and a registered sex offender.

266 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5121 03:15

>>265 incorrectly posted in the correcting minor nuances without regard for context thread rather than the previous post is a panda thread.

267 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5122 04:31

>>266 incorrectly regarded overall thread context in his correction of a minor nuance. And is a Panda.

268 Name: ( ・∀・)  : 1993-09-5132 11:40

>>267 started a new sentence for something which should have been a dependent clause.

269 Name: i OցOj : 1993-09-5133 13:15

>>268 is not welcome here for the BUUN is not with him.

270 Name: ( ・∀・)  : 1993-09-5133 23:00

>>269 failed to realize that there is a new default name.

271 Name: ( ・∀・)  : 1993-09-5133 23:39

>>270 doesn't happen to realize that human freedom is a privilege, not a right. Also, he doesn't realize Default is a bourgeoisie 3rd rate "grunge" band everyone has forgotten.

272 Name: ( ・∀・)  : 1993-09-5136 04:37

>>271 made many mistakes there, most of which I refuse to correct (regardless of context) out of respect for the value of my own time. Nevertheless, we all remember Default, now that you have reminded us.

273 Name: ( ・∀・)  : 1993-09-5136 21:10

>>272
Your parenthetical phrase interrupts the flow of your first sentence. I recommend using a footnote.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.