>that doesn't mean these books exist. Hmm.
They don't???
>...>>8 is talking out of his ass.
>You are part of the problem, >>8.
"attacks on one's opponent are a tried-and-true strategy for people who have a case that is weak."
>I would bet that >>8 is only extrapolating his "population of 40-ish housewives" from...
Good argument, just claiming that I'm extrapolating, when one paragraph above you even admit to doing exactly that ("The people I know who read "chick" books are not housewives"). Hmm, wow! A equals B, therefore C, thank goodness for flawless logics!
Actually, the core facts (housewives, 40, watch soaps) from my statement above come from a Lagardère Media target group survey on said type of books. I simply worded them less enthusiastic, "sorry".