>>23
Then it failed.
No matter whether it was "trying to be an insult" (hard to achieve over THE INTERNET), it just has nothing to do with "20th century misogyny" (like, totally last century, dude!) to describe the target audience like I did.
Even ignoring that, it's about as worthless a claim as arguing that "the attitude of icebergs is fascist because they try to suppress humanities' freedom of travelling to the north pole". What?