>>8
At the danger of sounding arrogant, I can assure you I am quite familiar with Chomsky's approach, although I'm definitely not a subscriber of Chomskianism. What I however was what-ing at is this:
>and has narrow views on what's "right" and what's "wrong" when talking about just pretty much that isn't morphology (or what would traditionally be called morphology). That's quite surprising coming from him.
I'm just intrigued to learn what you mean by "narrow views", or why you find "that" surprising coming from him.