Python development tool (62)

1 Name: #!usr/bin/anon 2005-09-01 02:00 ID:wXSGfJD8

I have to do assignments in python, and I'm looking for a good editor to code with. So far I've been using Kate, which is good enough -- but I'd like to know of alternatives.

I'm not to familier with the language, so it whould be nice if it whould show suggestions while I type (Like if I start typeing "stdin." it whould show a menu with "stdin.readline()" among other things.)

It whould also be nice if it had some documentation included, so I don't have to google when I stumble on functions that are unknown to me.

Thanks.

PS: I prefer vim over emacs ;)

2 Name: Furi!EuK0M02kkg 2005-09-01 02:48 ID:Heaven

Sounds like you want a Python IDE (integrated development environment). Sorry, I can't help you with that, but I'm sure you can find something if you google up IDEs for Python.

P.S. Good work, mate. Vim for the win.

3 Name: #!usr/bin/anon 2005-09-01 04:00 ID:Heaven

Calling Stephen Thorne to the thread!

4 Name: !WAHa.06x36 2005-09-01 10:17 ID:Heaven

You people need to get out of the seventies with your vim and your emacs.

5 Name: Stephen Thorne 2005-09-01 12:00 ID:Heaven

I use vim. I always have.

6 Name: #!usr/bin/anon 2005-09-01 17:03 ID:F7tc6Khb

7 Post deleted by moderator.

8 Name: !WAHa.06x36 2005-09-01 19:10 ID:uLTV697C

>>6 fails for opening new windows for each file. That's just not tenable when working on projects with five or ten or even more files. Which would be almost anything I personally work on.

9 Name: Furi!EuK0M02kkg 2005-09-05 00:25 ID:Heaven

>>4
Agreed, it's not fun, but what vim and emacs have going for them is a large usage base. I admit I don't know what a "better editor" would be. I'm not an interface professional, nor do I have any clue about what would work well/badly when you only have a command line available.

But at least I know that most systems will have vi/emacs/pico installed when I log on. That counts for a lot. I'm not saying it's good, I'm just saying that if I'm going to get proficient with an editor, it might as well be one that's available just about everywhere.

10 Name: !WAHa.06x36 2005-09-05 11:54 ID:uLTV697C

Well, a good editor would use keyboard combinations that have been standardized upon for something like a decade or two already: CTRL-X,C,V for cut, copy, paste, CTRL-S for saving, and so on. It's just that the Unix nerds are still stuck in the utterly retarded vi-vs-emacs thing, and nobody cares about making a sane editor.

11 Name: Mr VacBob!JqK7T7zan. 2005-09-05 17:34 ID:cnkL1695

12 Name: !WAHa.06x36 2005-09-05 20:02 ID:uLTV697C

>>11

TextWrangler is decent, but kind of clunky. It doesn't really live up to the OS X look, and the preferences is a joke. The text editing functionality itself isn't half bad, though. I just wish there was a way to turn of text antialiasing. Or rather, in a larger context, I wish Mac OS X had better text antialiasing. BeOS did both hinting and antialiasing at the same time, and it produced the most readable and beautiful text I've ever seen in a GUI. Nobody else does this. What gives?

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.