Ruby opinions (111)

11 Name: #!usr/bin/anon 2005-12-02 13:36 ID:sOPZ8Q9+

>>7 It's smalltalk with clear syntax
LOL, what ? Obviously you have never written anything serious in Smalltalk.

>>8 I am only learning Ruby so that I can evaluate Rails
Smalltalk is superior. Take a look at http://www.seaside.st/.

14 Name: #!usr/bin/anon 2005-12-02 22:49 ID:62cSNc39

>>11
Someone is porting seaside to ruby...too bad no one is using seaside or the port...
And no, I haven't written anything serious in smalltalk (has anyone?). The syntax is just too unbearable.

>>10
I don't find any of your examples weird. And I can't understand why you want static typing?

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification: