>>13 > So basically your post is stating that smalltalk is superior to ruby, and is backing it up by stating that you have experience in smalltalk and accusing >>7 of not having any?

No, not exactly. First I was commenting on >>7 statement about syntax. Because Smalltalk really has best syntax ever, it's very simple, clean and consistent, nothing I have ever seen comes close to it. It is clear that only real reason why someone could not like it is because he has not used Smalltalk for reasonable time.

Then what I was saying was that, if >>1 is learning Ruby just for Rails then as good he could learn Smalltalk for Seaside, because Smalltalk is superior. And I was not backing this up by anything, that's different story for different thread. Feel free to let me know if you would like to hear that story...