Web Framework (97)

67 Name: #!/usr/bin/anonymous : 2008-02-14 23:14 ID:Heaven

>>64

Look, what you're talking about is how programming languages used to work in the past. Perl 4 was like that. C is still like that.

Turns out, it fucking sucks to do things that way. That is why all languages add unicode support these days. They don't do it because they've been brainwashed by some Unicode conspiracy to design their languages to be horrible. They do it because it makes everything much easier, and everybody knows it, because the alternatives have been tried.

67 Name: #!/usr/bin/anonymous : 2008-02-14 23:14 ID:Heaven

>>64

Look, what you're talking about is how programming languages used to work in the past. Perl 4 was like that. C is still like that.

Turns out, it fucking sucks to do things that way. That is why all languages add unicode support these days. They don't do it because they've been brainwashed by some Unicode conspiracy to design their languages to be horrible. They do it because it makes everything much easier, and everybody knows it, because the alternatives have been tried.

67 Name: #!/usr/bin/anonymous : 2008-02-14 23:14 ID:Heaven

>>64

Look, what you're talking about is how programming languages used to work in the past. Perl 4 was like that. C is still like that.

Turns out, it fucking sucks to do things that way. That is why all languages add unicode support these days. They don't do it because they've been brainwashed by some Unicode conspiracy to design their languages to be horrible. They do it because it makes everything much easier, and everybody knows it, because the alternatives have been tried.

67 Name: #!/usr/bin/anonymous : 2008-02-14 23:14 ID:Heaven

>>64

Look, what you're talking about is how programming languages used to work in the past. Perl 4 was like that. C is still like that.

Turns out, it fucking sucks to do things that way. That is why all languages add unicode support these days. They don't do it because they've been brainwashed by some Unicode conspiracy to design their languages to be horrible. They do it because it makes everything much easier, and everybody knows it, because the alternatives have been tried.

67 Name: #!/usr/bin/anonymous : 2008-02-14 23:14 ID:Heaven

>>64

Look, what you're talking about is how programming languages used to work in the past. Perl 4 was like that. C is still like that.

Turns out, it fucking sucks to do things that way. That is why all languages add unicode support these days. They don't do it because they've been brainwashed by some Unicode conspiracy to design their languages to be horrible. They do it because it makes everything much easier, and everybody knows it, because the alternatives have been tried.

67 Name: #!/usr/bin/anonymous : 2008-02-14 23:14 ID:Heaven

>>64

Look, what you're talking about is how programming languages used to work in the past. Perl 4 was like that. C is still like that.

Turns out, it fucking sucks to do things that way. That is why all languages add unicode support these days. They don't do it because they've been brainwashed by some Unicode conspiracy to design their languages to be horrible. They do it because it makes everything much easier, and everybody knows it, because the alternatives have been tried.

67 Name: #!/usr/bin/anonymous : 2008-02-14 23:14 ID:Heaven

>>64

Look, what you're talking about is how programming languages used to work in the past. Perl 4 was like that. C is still like that.

Turns out, it fucking sucks to do things that way. That is why all languages add unicode support these days. They don't do it because they've been brainwashed by some Unicode conspiracy to design their languages to be horrible. They do it because it makes everything much easier, and everybody knows it, because the alternatives have been tried.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.