>>22
Hm? First you bump with >>19, saying something incorrect and of no importance (or indeed, relevance to this thread), then I correct you, and then you insult me.
If you don't like being corrected, you shouldn't do anything that requires skill, or at least stay away from forums. Other than that, the distinction that I made for the definition of cons is very important.
>>23
Hmmm, it seems that you are without a doubt a raging homosexual. One in ten people they say. Certainly the odds are not against it.
>>26
I agree that getting involved in discussions with trolls is most boring and repetitive, I believe that this individual is not a troll, but rather someone who was "insulted" by my correction. Before you scold me for my beliefs, wouldn't you agree that you believe as well as I do on the matter; because you believe he's a troll, and I believe he's not one.
You'll also note that all my replies insofar to this thread have been 'sage' posts, namely >>20,23,25 and the one you read now.
>>25,27
Contrary to what most homosexuals believe, the phrase "it seems" does not have in it implicit connotations of doubt. And it does seem that for the particular demographic of you, yourself, and probably your boyfriend, the odds are 1 in 1. And certainly I appreciate your opinion of me as not being a troll.