Who the fuck she think she is??
How many of these dumb shits have already invaded Wikipedia to spread the horrible gift of their unknowledge?
Everyone who edits it.
...for stupid people like me, what is it about the map?
A few hours ago I went to wikipedia, just in order to see how easy it is to find out the meaning of DQN.
It was right here on disambiguation page. But there was no own page for DQN itself!
Are the Wikipedia staff fool or crazy?
Hey, why do you have a page for US election when you don´t have a page for DQN?
Anyway, I clicked on 2channel just to find out that Hiroyuki gets about ¥100 million/year and he gives nothing to mods!
A second later I found myself on his page (and still there was no page for DQN). "Neomugicha incident" must be something interesting, so I went there.
Then Akihabara massacre, Osaka school massacre, Mamoru Takuma, went back to Akihabara, Tsutomu Miyazaki, Kaoru_Kobayashi, Akihabara massacre for the third time, Massacres in Japan, Bombing of Osaka in World War II, picked Dresden from the list, and later I chose to read about Hiroshima.
This made me feel deeply disturbed, but I continued to read article by article.
Somehow, I ended up reading about Kama Sutra.
>>1, wikipedia is not a reliable source of info. Encyclopedia Britannica is.
And if you are writing an article that should have even a bit of educational or scientific quality, go to the fucking library and do a research.
Wikipedia is not a reliable source of info. And it will never be.
>>10
Get back to social studies class, teach
>>10
Encyclopedia Britannica isn't a reliable source of info either.
>>12
They need more reliable citations in most of these fixes.
>>12
They need more reliable citations in most of these fixes.
Wikipedia isn't reliable because it is always being changed and is subject to internet drama, retards, and bias. Also, if a fact that was referenced to wikipedia is changed or deleted, you (as a reader) wouldn't be able to find out if the fact is true or not.
You wouldn't want to go into battle with an aluminum foil sword, would you?
I've always felt that Wikipedia is very useful if you just want to look something up quickly, like an album's tracklisting, the year someone was born, or other basic information. If you're pursuing anything academically or seriously, then you should go elsewhere.
>>15 is correct.
Wikipedia is very useful if you are looking for a chart of Pokemon and their abilities or a list of Star Trek episodes.
Wikipedia is very useless if you are looking for anything more serious. The mods there censor any and all edits they personally disagree with.
I felt embaraced.
Human: HAY THERE
WikiBot: Does "it" still refer to HAY THERE?
Human: HAY THERE
WikiBot: Let us change the subject.
Human: HAY THERE
WikiBot: Let us change the subject.
Human: hello
WikiBot: Hi there!
OP IS A DUMBSHIT
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
OP IS A DUMBSHIT
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
SAGE
I am a wikipedia addict, but some things just shouldn't be on wikipedia, yet are worth knowing. I mean informal classifications and stuff that just isn't universally accepted fact. Here is one of them. Prepare to lose more hours of your life, wikipedians. http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ApocalypseHow
>>21
I'm pretty sure everyone and their mother knows about tvtropes.
>>19,20 please wikify your replies.
lol this user is thinking of publishing a book, lmao
... Thanks for this profile link its pretty funny : )
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Princess_Janay/Userboxes
Publishing a book... Tear ah man thats good
>>8
add DNQ yourself, contribute!
>>26
I believe that:
Wikipedia is just as reliable as every other piece of information rewritten by man.
Wikipedia is really good for quick reference in most subjects. It does really win.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rursus
Rursus is one of those people who think they're sooooo funny and witty.
Ugh
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_be_a_dick
lol the word dick is repeated so many times...
For some reason, any page that Shii posts on becomes a tragedy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shii/Image_talk:Anime_by_nima.jpg
Let this show you how