YOKOHAMA — A U.S. serviceman from the U.S. aircraft carrier Kitty Hawk has admitted killing a 56-year-old Japanese woman in Yokosuka, Kanagawa Prefecture, informed sources said Thursday, citing investigations by U.S. forces in Japan.
http://www.crisscross.com/jp/news/360227
http://news19.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/newsplus/1136462853/l50
http://news19.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/newsplus/1136458370/l50
What are american soldiers still doing in Japan?
Killing women?
There are US Military Bases in Japan because they were left as "frontline" bases in the Cold War.
But mostly the troops there just rape and murder Japanese girls (like as in kids) and women and then get away with it because they've got the US military to block Japanese criminal investigations or court proceedings. Not that Japanese police care all that much about women anyway.
Then why are these americans staying? Its not their country so these gaijin should get the hell out.
U.S. Soldiers in Japan killed 1076 Japanese civilians from 1952 to 2004.
Is it normal in U.S. Army to kill civilians?
>>7
source?
here, but sorry i couldn't find source in English. Please refer table at bottom.
http://www.jcp.or.jp/akahata/aik4/2005-07-02/2005070201_02_1.html
It is from web page of japanese communist party. they are opposed to alliance between US army and Japan. it may be biased, but acording to the article the numbers were from Japanese Defence Ministry.
http://www.japan-press.co.jp/2438/usf3.html
I found translated page.
This is what I was saying: drive these gaijin soldiers the hell out of Japan.
Troll or not, it's not going to happen. Yes, US military personnel do stupid and sometimes awful things in Japan, but the US has (from what I understand) very strong economical and political reasons to maintain a military presence in east asia. And in general, what the US wants the US gets. QQ
>>12
yeah I know, but I just find it stupid that they are staying there even though they shouldn't have the right to and its not their country. I mean, why do americans always have to meddle in other countries' affair? Its none of their business. Take Irak for example.
Because superpower nations have the responsibilty to keep the world safe.
Pax Americana is only an imperialism.
>>14
Because superpower nations want to take over the world.
Fixed
>>16
Europeans can't take it when they can't pull a major superpower into their little buttsex group.