「New York Times」is All Islam Enemy (44)

1 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-06-25 18:33 ID:kgeP9g5W

「New York Times」is All Islam Enemy
Most Islam people believe that American is Islam Enemy.
But this is wrong. You must understand there are two groups in America.
The one group has International Moral, and most American belong this Group.
They love liberty, Racial Equality, Philanthropic. Also respect to all people.
The other one is Right Wing Group. They always like brainwash and mislead people
for they profit. They are evil, and do not care to kill people (Islam People), atrocity…
So after the [9.11], remember who makes lobby to Islam People that is [New York Times], Islam people must know, American is not Islam Enemy. [New York Times] is
Islam Enemy. World Enemy. Must extinct them!!

2 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-06-26 11:55 ID:MA/qyiuJ

>>1

if you think that's bad, watch FOX. They had a whole movie "banned by PBS" called Muslims against Jihad the whole point of which was to imply that all muslims are secretly plotting to jihad against us.

There are bad muslims, but there aren't nearly as many as the Reichwing wants us to believe.

3 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-06-27 08:41 ID:hEfjWacI

Anyway, disliking ALL muslims is like hating cats because one bit you once. That way of thinking is very childish, IMO.

4 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-06-30 19:21 ID:T8ZcbrJ3

Wtf?!?? NY Times is a Liberal rag. Liberals LOVE islam. >>1 fails.

5 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-07-02 01:13 ID:5FDFIMNP

The Middle East is stuck in the middle ages.

6 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-07-02 07:28 ID:UdiHdBcm

http://english.aljazeera.net/English/ is a really good news source, actually.

7 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-07-02 20:24 ID:MA/qyiuJ

>>6

I prefer BBC, myself, but whatever. Any forgein press is better than anything American ATM.

8 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-07-07 20:32 ID:Heaven

>>5,7
idiots.

9 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-07-09 04:14 ID:Heaven

>>8
amerikan

10 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-07-12 07:49 ID:OdMTLHFV

>>9 you really think BBC is better??? Oh man, because of your desperation and lack of proper news channels, you grab onto the shittiest of foreign news providers. BBC is just a extreme leftist propaganda channel that hates men, and is funded by everyone living in UK who owns a TV.

11 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-07-15 05:45 ID:Heaven

BBC has a liberal bias.
Oddly enough, Reality also has a liberal bias

12 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-07-18 02:03 ID:MA/qyiuJ

>>11

If you just read one source, you're fucked. I use BBC and Fox. Between the two, I probably hear most of the story.

13 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-07-18 04:10 ID:Heaven

>>12
Fox doesn't tell a story, it trumpets a PR line.

14 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-07-18 17:04 ID:LmdVWJZp

>>12

That's true, it doesn't rely much on original research, you should try a more reliable conservative news source like the Washington Times, maybe. Not that I would consider a conservative news source that reliable...

I figure the majority of the better papers out there are gonna lean to the left, since the left tends to be more educated. ..

Oops, did I just say that?

15 Name: 166 : 2007-07-18 18:56 ID:0caHcWcX

>>11

>Reality also has a liberal bias

Being a little radical aren't we? Open your eyes, it's not New York everywhere. Actually, it's not NY in 99.9999999% of the world.

16 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-07-18 18:59 ID:0caHcWcX

>>12

omg. you guys are fucked.

17 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-07-18 19:40 ID:Heaven

>>15

> Being a little radical aren't we? Open your eyes,

A great way to convince anyway of your worldview. Accuse your opponent of being a ignorant extremist!

> Actually, it's not NY in 99.9999999% of the world.

Wrong, it's actually not New York in 91.95% of the word. A small corner of that 91.95% being right here.

18 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-07-18 22:02 ID:reGJhaMD

日本語でおk

19 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-07-19 23:11 ID:udF9bWYa

>>17

I don't know if New York State counts, does it?

Anyway, New York State only comprises 0.027% of the Earth's total surface area, and 0.094% of the total land area, so I don't know what you're talking about.

20 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-07-20 18:41 ID:Heaven

>>19

Population

21 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-07-20 20:07 ID:zUmoHdVd

>>20
Go ahead, think that population of NEW YORK TIMESISTS will change anything. You guys are the REAL minority. You deserve to be crushed.

22 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-07-21 06:29 ID:Heaven

>>21
Please, see a doctor. They can effectively treat most psychosis these days.

23 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-07-30 11:35 ID:Heaven

>>22
Too bad psychology is a non-science.

24 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-08-02 14:39 ID:MXwRBkd7

http://english.chosun.com/w21data/html/news/200708/200708020009.html
When God created the world, he found a trash heap that couldn't be used for anything useful, so he threw it down to the earth and turned into Afghanistan, a story goes. Afghanistan is such a desolate and forlorn land. Taliban, grant "salaam" to the innocent young people who arrived in the most barren land in the world to help it become a land of peace.

25 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-08-03 01:52 ID:hdd5oSYJ

>>24
Eh? I thought one of the reason why Afghanistan was invaded due to the oil it has the US wanted to build a pipeline?

26 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-08-03 08:08 ID:OdMTLHFV

>>25
It was actually not oil but natural gas.

27 Post deleted by moderator.

28 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-08-19 05:57 ID:d3gRv0l6

US invaded NK, Us invaded Vietnam, US invaded Afga...

how many is their war bugdet...?

29 Name: George Orwell : 2007-08-26 00:41 ID:Heaven

lol propaganda.

30 Post deleted by moderator.

31 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-11-05 12:00 ID:WG3kEZD0

>>28

they're the one who's selling the guns, didnt you watch "lords of war" ? its based on real story. and

>>3
>>5

true, i got lots of muslim friends, they're nice and they also didnt like those extreme likes to jihad muslims as well. they found that it was uncivilized and they still lived in middle ages.

32 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-11-06 16:42 ID:FH7N4/fi

>>20

And? Your math still sucks.

New York doesn't have 520 million people, which it'd need to be 8.05% (100%-91.95%) of the world.

33 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-11-10 19:00 ID:Heaven

>>32

I'm surprised it took six months for someone to call me out on that.

34 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-12-03 04:17 ID:Yq33MaF2

islam is a cancer on humanity that must and will be excised.

35 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-12-03 15:30 ID:ImKRjhlD

>>1

wtf? did you think that by putting the words New Yor Times before a newspost that I'd actually look past all the grammatical errors and barely concealed misunderstanding of the english language and believe whatever crap you cooked up?

FAIL.

36 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-12-03 22:04 ID:XVS4FRJZ

>>35

>>wtf? did you think that by putting the words New Yor Times before a newspost
>>the words New Yor Times before a newspost
>>New Yor Times

Lol. Don't try to rip anyone a new asshole if you make the same mistakes they did.

37 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-12-04 21:36 ID:zZBeKTbU

>>36

I think s/he was pointing out that a)that wasn't properly sourced and b)the source was even spelt wrong

38 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-12-08 12:23 ID:wlsfFuqy

>>37

I think s/he (>>36) was pointing out that making such arguments littered with bad spelling is no better than the OP.

39 Name: Unverified Source : 2007-12-12 18:39 ID:Ukwt2vAJ

The Schulzberger Ochs clan is one of those old money Reform Jewish families, and they happen to own the New York Times. In spite of owners coming from a POV, they DO try to be neutral-point-of-view and try to be accurate in their reporting. ("Trying to" is not actually BEING accurate, though!)

That being said, the New York Times is hardly any enemy of Islam - why should it try to be an enemy of anything other than restrictions to the media, or its rivals in the media industry?

40 Name: Borat : 2008-01-22 23:32 ID:Heaven

I have prove that American media is run by jew. I read New York Times for an entire week, and there is not one Anti-Semitic article.

41 Name: Unverified Source : 2008-01-28 22:06 ID:L1DEqlY2

>>The Schulzberger Ochs clan is one of those old money Reform Jewish families, and they happen to own the New York Times.

moar liek Jew York Times, amirite?

42 Name: Unverified Source : 2008-01-29 18:48 ID:y+SqBfNS

>>41

ursorite

43 Name: Unverified Source : 2008-02-13 14:54 ID:mqRRm/2/

44 Name: Unverified Source : 2008-02-13 16:13 ID:771VdmV5

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.