>>16
I expect people whom reply with targeted criticism on such a topic, taking the time to do so on a rather small 'special interests' forum, to have a little more intelligence. I see that I am mistaken, and thus there is no point I can make, nor even seriousness with which I can continue to press an issue that is clearly above the comprehension of those who believe they have the right to fling unstructured criticism. Thank you for disproving me. It is unproductive to waste my time in such a manner.