Fellow 4-chers! Recently I was discussing the last hundred years of what the American Empire has been doing to foreign countries, such as invasion, trade blockades, the propagation of "free market theory", and quoted many of my sources (Noami Klien, Noam Chomsky, official documents, etc.). A neocon told me I was an idiot and I should be sent to boot camp for re-education! A neolib told me I'm full of shit and should be shot! I asked them to back up their claims against the people/documents I was quoting from, and they simply ignored me.

So I put it to you! For instance, I made the claim that since under the 1996 War Crimes Act, a Commander In Chief is liable for the actions of his soldiers, and under the Geneva Convention, the raid of a hospital of any kind, by either side, is a violation of the Geneva Convention. Does that mean because they raided a Fallujah General Hospital, that Bush can be put to death? The Commander In Chief is defined as a person who falls under the 1996 War Crimes Act passed by the Republicans, and thus would that make Bush liable?

http://www.beggarscanbechoosers.com/2005/11/did-us-forces-seize-fallujah-hospital.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Crimes_Act_of_1996

I was viciously spat at!

However, I realize this is one situation. Does anyone here have any direct evidence against, say, Noam Chomsky? That he's a fraud or doctored some of the documents he discussed? I really do need to know. I don't believe everything the man says, but I'm hard pressed to find anything contrary to what the guy says.