lol: http://www.baltimorechronicle.com/2007/122407Lindorff.shtml
He seems to have forgotten that the Right is pro shooting people.
I didn't like any of them, so I voted Paul, as I think of libertarians as the "none of the above" candidates.
I'm in the communist party because democracy is a myth, just like gravity...
and gravy.
>> If global warming is a myth, than why is there warming on a global scale?
There isn't. The southern hemisphere hasn't gotten significantly warmer in over 25 years, and the hottest year on record for the northern hemisphere was 1934.
Here's both sides of the argument: http://climatedebatedaily.com/
Naturally, you should only read the side that agrees with your beliefs.
That's a great website, >>11. Thanks for the link. I've not made up my mind on this and it's good to see a place where both sides are being acknowledged.
Global warming is bs. Some scientist are saying we will have an ice age, because one half of antartica is freezing. Wtf is up with that
Al Gore didn't invent the internet, but he did invent (the alarmist idea of) Global Warming...
>>13
"Global Warming" is 1% science, 99% politics.
In the 1970s, the environmentalist wackos said pollution was going to cause another Ice Age and it was going to KILL US ALL in TEN YEARS.
In the 1980s, the environmentalist wackos said that something called "acid rain" was going to KILL US ALL in TEN YEARS.
In the 1990s, the environmentalist wackos wanted to ban the technology of refrigeration, blah blah KILL US ALL IN TEN YEARS.
Now "global warming" is their current propaganda. And when it's disproven, they'll find something else. They're shameless.
>>9,>>10,>>15
Don't get people confused. That the current GW is man-made (aka CO2) is a myth, but it is possbile to say that
current temparatures are warmer than, say, a few decades ago. This kind of observation can be done throughout
the life of the earth. Just observe the activity of the sun and earth temperatures. That's where the truth lies.
>"Global Warming" is 1% science, 99% politics.
The seperation is no longer clear. Just mention CO2 in a grant request. There you go. Scientists need money too.
it's always confused me that people can be so hostile to environmental science.
humanity's been kicking around for ~200000 years. in the past 200, it has changed massively. whether or not this is sustainable is uncertain. and continuing without discovering or caring as to if it is is terribly dangerous for everyone.
> In the 1970s1980s1990senvironmentalist wackosenvironmentalist wackosenvironmentalist wackosKILL US ALLKILL US ALLKILL US ALLIce Ageacid rainrefrigerationTEN YEARS.TEN YEARS.TEN YEARS.
Is there a source for this alarmism, is this heresay, or is it right-wing propaganda intended to counter left-wing propaganda?