>>10 Maybe this is too optimistic, but I think any improvement on the voting system in terms of thought is a good thing. Even if people are too stupid to appreciate it, perhaps such a system could coax them to educate themselves.

Like right now, political information comes to the public largely in the form of PR, Viral Ads, and a very small percentage of people watch debates or know the issues their particular candidates will vote for. Maybe a system that promotes freedom of information, a dynamic vote as discussed would also promote intelligence.

maybe not.