Static Energy (31)

30 Name: Mad Scientist 2005-12-14 13:47 ID:xa/C7KCl

>>29 it says in 27 that

>it's not really fair to refute any of the direct statements in them.

Which leaves unclear whether you would like to rant on about phantasies of superduper static electricity, or rather talk about what is physically possible.

Srry, I don't know !Waha.06x36 very well, since I'm new here. Please don't think anyone would recognize your cynicism.

Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...
Verification: