> It is not fair to claim that it is simply evolution taking its course, because evolution focuses on a diversity of animals coevolving to the benefit of one another.
Wrong.
Evolution doesn't say anything about diversity or evolving "to the benefit of one another". It simply says that those animals which are the best adapted to their environment will survive and the ones that aren't will eventually either adapt or die out.
Can't we claim in fact that mankind is simply acting in response to evolution by eliminating other less successful species? Personally I'm a conservationist and would hate to loose the manatee but from a definition of evolution isn't man just one more link in the chain so to speak? Even if we nuked the planet I imagine life in it's most basic forms will plod along and eventually return to a diversified state.
Even "acting in response to evolution" is a meaningless concept. Evolution is not a force that affects living beings. It is simply a result of living beings, well, living, and dying.
In short, anything we do is the will of evolution. Even Hitler helped us evole.