>Prove this please.
I already did, presupposing that there is no God.
>You presuppose that there is no God, and therefore lose the preconditions for intelligibility. How do you account for the universal, abstract, invriant laws of logic, and the uniformity of nature apart from God?
Easy answer: I don't. Why would I need to? If they don't exist, I don't even need to proove that prooving God is not possible, since then it's impossible anyways. If they do exist, as you presuppose, then my argumentation is perfectly valid.