>>299

>What was positted, however, is nothing like just changing the names, a denial of the God of Christianity was included. For that I would need to see YOUR bible, and the justification for it, so I could properly refute it.

Bla, bla, "me no understand", bla, bla. Basically, you're still dodging.

Here is an easy, step by step guide:

1. Take your bible.
2. Add after "And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed.": "And the LORD God told him: If you ever hear of a God who calls himself the christian god, or who is like the god they will call the christian god, be aware: I am not this God, and this God does not exist!"
3. Apply transformation: All names that would make it the christian bible are changed to their reverse version.

You have no excuse left. Answer.

By the way, where do you get the justification for your reasoning anyways? How can you logically argue against me without borrowing from my worldview? Remember, my worldview is the only worldview that give a justification for the laws of logic and the uniformity of nature.