> 1. When was the meeting?

The "meeting" started at the beginning of human history and it is still in progress.

> 2. How could you determine what 'smart' was before the laws of logic were agreed upon?

Obviously before there were any humans to observe, no human thought anything was smart.

> 3. Could they have agreed that A could be not A at the same time and in the same way, or is the law of non-contradiction universally binding?

Someone could have agreed upon that. It would be silly and it would force me to think of them as illogical but there's nothing stopping them.

> 4. If enough people agreed that A could be not A at the same time and in the same way, would that law then be true?

According to me? No. According to "reality"? The problem with your thesis is that you think that reality includes human concepts such as logic and morals. There is no such thing as logic or morals in the objective bubble of reality, only material things which we can observe.

> 5. How many people does it take to agree upon a law of logic before it is valid?

Who will judge whether it is valid? Since God does not exist nobody can perfectly objectively say what is valid. I am doing the judging, so in my opinion, only I have to agree to make it valid.

> 6. Did the law of non-conradiction apply before humans came to this 'agreement?'

There are no immaterial things outside our minds. Therefore, the concept of a "law of non-contradiction" is something within our minds, and was invented when we first thought of it. This is a rather worthless statement about linguistics and you cannot in any way convince me that God exists with a reductio ad absurdum based on this.