>>311
Which is it:

1. You only read what I wrote up to 1.
2. You really don't understand what I wrote. Rather unlikeley, you're not that stupid.
3. You can not understand what I wrote since it would make your "proof" invalid, so your brain is "blocked" against understanding it.
4. You are playing dumb on purpose because you still think you can somehow magically prove your God to me.
5. You have relized that your "proof" is invalid, but you are playing dumb on purpose just because you do not want to lose.

In any case, you have been given my bible, which significantly differs from your bible - after all, it says that there is no christian god - and you have been given my worldview. You have every little piece of information you asked for, even though that is not even required for my argumentation - remember, you have to defend against every possible argument, against every argument that could be made against you. All of this has been laid out for you on a level so low that your average 10 year old should be able to understand it. Tell me why I would be wrong while you would be right. If you can not do so, for whatever reason it may be, don't bother with more lame excuses, just shut up and get out.