>It is immediately perceptually evident. Pretty much self-evident.
But the normalcy of the perceiver, or the perception, is arbitrary in a non-theistic worldview.
>I do not believe in a 'random universe'.
Where did the 'order' come from. Who was the 'orderer?'
>Yes, change is possible. That is not a violation of identity. B is still itself.
Good point, but we still have the problem of the normalcy of the perceiver, and the unaccounted for means by which we interperet perception.