Proof that God Exists (615, permasaged)

66 Name: Anonymous Scientist : 2007-01-20 18:47 ID:Heaven

>>63

>And your evidence for this would be?….

It is of the same type as this "His Word" thing you like to talk about.

>That your senses fool you ‘all the time.’

Seen any otical illusion lateley?

>That you can ‘obviously not trust your senses’ because of 1.
>That any proof based on observation can be doubted.
>That the sentence “The only thing you can prove without observation, only using logic, is that you can doubt everything besides your doubt.” is true.

Those are not assumptions, those follow from 1).

>That nature is uniform such that the words >>24 uses to construct his sentences mean the same things they did 5 seconds ago.

See, this is your problem: You are human too. Same goes for your words, so: If >>24 was wrong, you would be wrong too. If >>24 was right, you would still be wrong.

>According to your worldview adding 2 things to 2 things could have equalled 5 things?!?

Yes. I would not understand worlds where this is true, but they could exist.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.