> http://home.sprynet.com/~owl1/rand.htm#1
Now, I do agree that Objectivism is a bigpile of nonsense, but I'm really having trouble with some of these arguments. The author makes far too much of a priori knowledge and universals, for one.
He makes some obviously wrong claims about a priori knowledge, for one:
There are other questionable ones, such as "If A and B have different heights, then either A is taller than B or B is taller than A" and "'Inside' is a transitive relation" which seem to be simply derived statements from definitions of terms and mathematics and physics, and certainly should not be considered a priori.