> And you haven't seen even a tiny sliver of the evidence, because you are not a climate scientist.

actually i am, but that's completely irrelevant.

> How much evidence have you seen that general relativity is correct? Plate tectonics?

quite a bit, actually.

> Evolution?

i'm reserving judgment on that one until i see some real scientific evidence for or against it.

> http://www.realclimate.org/index.php?p=170

so a liberal think-tank claims that nasa misinterpreted the data and i should just believe them?
also, i notice that they don't say exactly what the problem was or how it was fixed and the only reliable sources they refer to are 404'd.