>>88
You answer the analogies that I used, not the actual points that I made. When I raise a point about how companies don't give a shit about anything except for profits, you're not supposed to talk about how you like nuclear power plants. Ditto with the emissions point. Stop being so evasive, picking at trivialities and address the actual point.

You attack >>81 for silly points, but the fact is you've said nothing of substance that can rebut them.

>Then go to your cuddleparty, and first turn of your computer.

Reverting to personal insults. It shows what a convincing argument you've made.