re: "however, the proof that God exists is that without Him you couldn’t prove ANYTHING. God is the necessary precondition for intelligibility, intelligibility exists, therefore God exists."

> By the way, did you forget the part of >>48 about the anthropic principle?

re: "What is your evidence that the human reasoning you use to validate this evidence, is itself valid?"

What is your evidence that the divine reasoning you call upon to validate your own evidence is itself valid? I don't think either of us have any, so let's not needlessly cast doubt on our own reasoning. If it's flawed reasoning, the course of the debate will hopefully show it as it such.