Gille Deleuze (23)

10 Name: Anonymous Scientist : 2008-03-05 09:32 ID:9mIlXSSg

>>9

I think that to have an interesting conversation, you have to add some more meat to your posts.

I mean, to say that Spinoza and Bergson are too metaphysical does not bring much,... Is Kant too philosophical? Is Nietzsche too bookish? In the same vein, what does it bring to say that Deleuze philosophy is based on dated metaphysics? Additions, subtractions and sex are as old as it can get, but they are still all the rage, at the moment.

So specifically, what do you love or criticize in Deleuze's philosophy, or whatever philosopher you want to discuss about?

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.