[Debate] The Problem of Evil [Religion] (79)

34 Name: Anonymous Scientist : 2008-06-29 18:16 ID:Z3VRn7pg

God isn't responsible for the evil acts that humans enact upon each other. He is not our "maid" and shouldn't have to clean up after ourselves. Humans bestow heinous acts upon each other because humans are steeped in "sin" and coupled with free will, are capable of acts that can be called truly satanic in nature.

In response to God killing His own son, God allowed men to kill his own son because of his Love towards humans that he was willing to shed the blood of his own son in order for humans to be able to obtain salvation.

For the comment about crusades, sure flagrant hypocrisy does mar what the church stands for, but in essence, should not invalidate the objective truth-claims of christianity. john Montgomery wrote, "If Albert Einstein was arrested for shoplifting, would that make E=mc2 wrong"? The example might be a little far'fetched, but the ideology behind the quote doesn't change, which is: A message or teaching can still be true even if the messenger is morally flawed.

In connection with the third paragraph, there is a general misconception that Christianity is essentially about moral rules. Like in the first sentece, this idea is a misconception. Too many Christians these days place too much emphasis on ethics and not enough on the salvation aspect. McGrath puts it in these words, "Christianity is a strongly ethical faith. This does not, however, Christianity is about a set of rules, in which christians mechanically conform to a set of directions. Rather, it is about a set of values which arises from being redeemed."

Light was actually the second thing God created, which was after the heavens and the earth. Life started to appear after the second "day". Ugh, why did I type this out again

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.