Nuclear war? (56)

30 Name: Anonymous Scientist : 2008-07-25 16:19 ID:y5+o9RGp

>>29
not if said competeitor nukes you back. Hence the idea od Mutually Assured destruction.

>>28
The russian's bomb that >>22 speaks of was called the FOAB. Its bigger than MOAB. and yes, its stu[idly big but its more destructive than the bombs in hiroshima and nagasaki. While those two bombs are shit compared to today's bombs, they are perfect for leveling a country to steal from t because it is conventional explosives. I, Personally, have always liked the idea of using chemical warfare. it can be cleaned up if you know what it is and its only gonna kill the enemy. Imagine the hell that would ensue if n enemy nation managed to contaminate the natians water supplis with massive amounts of lsd (say 10,000 parts per billion solution in our water.) it isnt hard to do as the stuff is potent and large batches can be made. if the major cities all went on lsd trips simultaneously, all that would be required would be standard cruise missle attacks to trigger mass hysteria from everyone havign a bad trip. Counter that! as of right now there is NO effective way to cut an lsd trip short. and the average trip time is about 8 - 12 hours. so, ya. that trumps nuclear war. thats how id fuck a country up.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.