Linux soundcard (15)

1 Name: CyB3r h4xX0r g33k 2005-05-30 03:41 ID:L+zUz6zd

I'm looking for a good soundcard for linux. I guess my onboard one doesnt cut it, keeps detecting it as an intel8x0 or some shit. Don't suppose a high end audigy would be good for it?

2 Name: CyB3r h4xX0r g33k 2005-05-31 02:14 ID:6BQ5z6Gy

I've never had any problem with emu10k1, which I think is the same chip as an audigy (mine was a live)

3 Name: dmpk2k!hinhT6kz2E 2005-05-31 08:38 ID:oHFgUKhV

I never had any problems with any soundcard I've ever had (soundblaster and a couple of onboard). However, setting it up in the first place was often a pain.

Side-comment: soundblasters are the utter dregs of soundcards. They were the standard once, but are utter junk now. Either stick with onboard, or get something decent like an M-Audio.

4 Name: CyB3r h4xX0r g33k 2005-06-03 08:28 ID:L+zUz6zd

>>3 Umm... I don't record music so... Why would I want an M-Audio? They dont even have Dolby Digital?

5 Name: dmpk2k!hinhT6kz2E 2005-06-03 11:12 ID:eiBg+1M9

It's not a question of "why would I want an M-Audio?" It's a question of "why would I want a Creative?"

Creative is still well-known due to the momentum it built up during the DOS-era, but the cards have been a joke for almost a decade. It doesn't help that their windows drivers are also buggy. Onboard sound is good enough now that there really is no reason to buy a Creative, unless you like wasting money.

As for dolby... on linux? Well, you can get surround from M-Audio too: http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/Revolution71-main.html

Really, it's not Creative. It's anything but Creative.

6 Name: CyB3r h4xX0r g33k 2005-06-03 16:58 ID:L+zUz6zd

But MP3's sound like shit on M-Audio.

7 Name: dmpk2k!hinhT6kz2E 2005-06-04 01:00 ID:pS4wZpa5

As opposed to Creative, where everything sounds like shit.

Who listens to 128kbps MP3s anymore anyway?

8 Name: CyB3r h4xX0r g33k 2005-06-05 22:03 ID:L+zUz6zd

Who doesnt is the question you should be asking. BTW, how can you say everything sounds like shit on Creative? I highly doubt you've ever compared the two together.

9 Name: dmpk2k!hinhT6kz2E 2005-06-06 00:31 ID:O7wNF9Bp

Because I use expensive headphones (beats paying several thousand dollars for an amp and speakers). I hear bad sound. And 128kbps MP3s aren't that common anymore; it's easy to make (or acquire, you bad person you) higher bitrates.

Yes, I've owned a Creative. The S/N ration on that POS was horrible, and I could hear system noise constantly.

The question I should ask you is why you are so defensive about Creative. Brand-name loyalty is silly; it's not like Creative is your lover or owes you something. Nor is Creative's inferior cards a big secret: go read hydrogenaudio or any other major audio forum some time.

In all fairness, I hear the Audigy2 is not all that bad, but that makes it the only one (and there are cheaper and better cards out there, hah).

10 Name: CyB3r h4xX0r g33k 2005-06-06 03:28 ID:L+zUz6zd

You're obviously a wanna-be audiophile. "Expensive Headphones"lol.

11 Name: dmpk2k!hinhT6kz2E 2005-06-06 04:33 ID:O7wNF9Bp

The best you can come up with is some misguided ad hominem?

12 Name: CyB3r h4xX0r g33k 2005-06-06 05:39 ID:pKfu+I7w

How expensive is expensive? I have Sony MDR-V6 (which, although dirt cheap by audiophile standards, are apparently popular among recording studio engineers) and I couldn't hear this bad audio.

13 Name: dmpk2k!hinhT6kz2E 2005-06-06 08:54 ID:aypwKcZT

A five year old pair of Koss. Cost me $150, so not exactly audiophile-expensive (just bum-poor-student-expensive).

What specific card do you have?

14 Name: CyB3r h4xX0r g33k 2005-06-07 04:50 ID:pKfu+I7w

Well, now I'm on a Mac Mini, but I had a Soundblaster Live as mentioned in >>2.

15 Name: Fabian 2005-07-01 00:11 ID:Heaven

The soundcard-list of the alsa-project is pretty useful when searching for a soundcard for Linux. The ALSA-driver/-kernel-module already support lots of soundcards.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.