For me, it's 80x25. But if I decide I need graphics for some reason, then I use 1024x768.
1024*768, refresh rate no lower than 75Hz. If a game is too demanding, 800*600. With the increasing resolution of porn images, I may need to move up.
My laptop can't do better than 1024x768. :(
1024x768 here. Anything bigger is too small.
1280x1024
lol native resolution
1280x800 (best my laptop can do)
only at 60Hz, tho... xrandr says i could bump it up to 70Hz if i drop the resolution down to 1024x768, but 1024x768 looks like crap on a 1280x800 screen...
>Anything bigger is too small.
get a better operating system.
1280x1024 at 75 Hz. 8ms flat screen here
800x600 32-bit at 85Hz(maximum Hz).
I can go up to 1280x1024 32bit at 60Hz(bleah).
>get a better operating system.
Windows XP, 19" monitor.
1600 x 1200 is my max.
>Windows XP
like i said before, get a better operating system. windows xp's gui sucks for anything except gaming. actually, it's not all that great for that either...
Are there any flat monitors that don't look like complete ass on a non-native resolution?
1680 x 1050. Mmm, widescreen.
600X800
>>11
none that i know of...
if anyone knows of any, please tell us.
They used to exist. My old laptop's video card had good resampling and filtered, so the LCD looked decent on non-native resolutions.
I haven't seen something like this in a while though. It probably because people don't switch resolutions as much as they used to?