ITT we correct minor nuances of the previous post without regard for context (273)

1 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5052 06:27

In actuality, >>0 should be a link to http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1182180250/64.

2 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5052 07:45

"In actuality" is a stupid phrase

3 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5052 08:50

Calling phrases stupid is so last millennium.

4 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5052 15:41

The 'that is so last X' phrase has jumped the shark long ago.

5 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5052 22:57

You should be using double quote marks there.

6 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5053 05:17

Although either the single or double style is generally accepted depending on regional preference, I believe you are referring to what are properly known as quotation marks, and not simply quote marks.

7 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5053 07:53

tl;dr

8 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5053 12:51

There's no reason to use texting shortcuts when a complete keyboard is available to type on.

9 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5053 15:08

You neglect to consider the possibility that the poster may not have a keyboard, and must use alternative methods to input data. Such as copy and paste from the character map.

10 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5053 15:39

That last sentence is a fragment.

11 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5054 19:58

A fragment is not really a sentence at all, then, is it?

12 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5061 00:01

>>11's poster used too many clauses to express an incorrrect opinion, thereby invalidating any further statements from said poster.

13 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5061 00:29

>>12's poster used too many r's in "incorrrect" therein.

14 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5061 00:43

>>13 copied >>12's sentence structure, thereby ensuring his reply would be grammatically incorrect. He also failed to put out the previous poster's Genetic Fallacy, and resorted instead to the easier path of pointing out a typo.

15 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5061 02:11

I do wish that posters would stop using abbreviations like typo for typographical error... We are not juvenile adolescents using cellular telephones.

16 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5061 03:12

"Juvenile adolescent" is redundant.

17 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5061 12:45

>>16
As one could be an average adolescent, or a particularly mature adolescent, surely one could be a particularly juvenile adolescent? An adolescent more adolescent than other adolescents, if you will.

18 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5061 12:56

"An adolescent more adolescent than other adolescents, if you will." is nothing more than a mere sentence fragment.

19 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5061 13:00

>>17 Used 6 times the word "adolescent". Try a synonyms dictionary for a more varied and elegant writing.

20 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5061 16:28

I do agree with >>19 but I fear that he writing for style. Better also use a dictionary while you're at it.

21 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5061 16:34

>>20 used zero of one mandatory "is" in his sentence. Could that possibly be an indicator of his lacking grasp of the English language?

22 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5061 16:35

>>21 poses a question to the readers which they will be quite unable to answer.

23 Name: ⊂二二二（ ＾ω＾）二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5061 16:41

>>22 purports to know the readers' ability to answer such questions, when he really cannot be certain about it. Also, since the word "unable" describes a complete lack of ability, it is unnecessary to prefix it with "quite".

Return Entire thread Next 100 posts Last 50 posts
This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.