ITT we correct minor nuances of the previous post without regard for context (273)

1 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5052 06:27

In actuality, >>0 should be a link to http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1182180250/64.

101 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5068 12:47

>>100 did not link nor quote, inducing confusion for the readers.

102 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5068 12:49

>>101 is under the mistaken impression that this board has readers.

103 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5068 13:58

>>102 is under a more mistaken impression than >>101. Certainly someone must read these posts in order to correct minor nuances of the previous post without regard for context.

104 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5069 13:56

>>102-103 are incorrectly regarding context.

105 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5069 16:45

>>104 English, do you speak it??

106 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5069 18:51

>>105 etou... I really so don't understand the meaning of including two question marks at the end of a sentence.

107 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5069 19:53

> I really so don't

Even if that "so" was just an interjection, it's still grammatically incorrect. Unless of course you speak the Southern California English dialect.

108 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5069 20:41

>>107 Is also making grammatical mistakes. The title would be "Southern Californian", because the adjective form of California is needed here to describe the kind of English dialect.

109 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5069 21:06

>>108 unnecessarily capitalised "Is".

110 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5069 21:31

>>109 spelled capitalize with an 'S', which is the preferred method in Australian English and my own native dialect, but it still bugs me as a 'Z' is more phonetically and aesthetically pleasing.

111 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5069 21:38

>>110 used the tired slang/cliche "bugs me" which bugs me

112 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5069 21:56

>>111 neglected to include a closing punctuation mark, giving the impression that he's not yet finished with his critique.

113 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5069 22:03

>>112 was observative in their impression, but wrongly assumed that >>111 is a man.

114 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5069 22:53

>>113 fails to subscribe to the locally dominant meme that there are no girls on the internet.

115 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5069 23:06

>>114
"Locally"? That superstition is everywhere.

116 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5069 23:46

>>115
You have attempted to construct a sentence out of a single word, yet every grammarian worth his salt knows that at least two words are required.

117 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5070 02:09

>>116
You is awfully familiar. Please use "This distinguished poster" from now on when referring to our person.

118 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5070 03:08

>>117

> You are awfully familiar.
> "You" is awfully familiar.
> [quote] That pronoun is overused and trite.

For your consideration, I have provided two corrections and a revision of dialectical superiority.

119 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5070 07:55

>>118
Correcting things? On the internet? In this day and age?

120 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5070 09:47

>>119 includes three question marks. However, he failed to ask a question, instead punctuating three sentence fragments.

121 Name: TripcodeForSale!PYZX54X2L. : 1993-09-5070 10:28

There's no such thing as a question fragment.

122 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5070 10:38

>>120 was not referring to question fragments. >>121 would do well to read the post he wants to correct more thoroughly in future.

123 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5070 11:22

The second sentence of >>122 is ambiguous, and should be reworded as ">>121 would do well in the future to read more thoroughly the post he wants to correct" or similarly, to avoid misinterpretation.

124 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5070 21:21

The first sentence of >>123 is ambiguous, and should be reworded as "The second sentence of >>122 is ambiguous, and should be reworded as ">>121 would do well in the future to read more thoroughly the post he wants to be corrected" or similarly, to avoid misinterpretation." or similarly, to avoid misinterpretation.

125 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5070 21:45

>>124's nested double quotes have confused me eyes greatly and so I refuse to try and correct minor nuances of his post without regard for context.

126 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5071 01:10

>>125 thinks he is Yoda with his "me eyes". Yoda protip: Yoda Englishman is not.

127 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5071 01:49

>>126

> protip

This is not an English word, why did you say it?

128 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5071 03:24

>>127

Your grammatical correction of that kopipe was unappreciated and unnecessary. Also, shoot it until it dies.

129 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5071 03:37

>>128 I'm growing weary of those Japanese words used in English. Use something more talkative to English speakers, like "copypasta".

130 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5071 03:57

>>129

> copypasta

This is not an English word why did you say it

Loanwords have a heavy presence in most every language.
Speaking modern English is actually impossible if one refrained from using words taken from other languages.

131 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5071 11:55

The last two sentences of >>130 are logically related, so the line break between them is unnecessary.

132 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5071 14:38

>The last two sentences of >>130 are logically related, the line break between them is unnecessary.

Fixed.

(They are people who find people saying "so" distasteful.)

133 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5071 15:40

> Corrected minor nuances of the previous post without regard for context

Fixed.

134 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5071 19:19

> Removed the nutsack to prevent breeding and aggressive, vexatious behaviour in the neighbourhood.

Corrected.

135 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5071 19:47

>>134 what the fuck is a greater than sign doing in your post anyway?? If you want to quote quote unquote the post, just do so. We don't have the time to sift through your post and find what you actually mean.

136 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5071 20:51

>>135 provided too many minor nuances, so I pass.

137 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5071 21:19

>I am lazy.

Wasn't that what you meant?

138 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5071 21:25

>>137 you mean "meaned" right? Otherwise, I don't want to even consider your post.

139 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5071 22:07

>>138 stands on its own, and no amount of correction would be enough.

140 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5071 22:12

That comma was extraneous.

141 Name: TripcodeForSale!PYZX54X2L. : 1993-09-5072 00:31

That was an unnecessarily trite thing to say.

142 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5072 05:48

Brevity is the soul of wit, and tediousness the limbs and outward flourishes.

143 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5072 12:07

While the words 'soul' and 'limbs' anthropomorphize the metaphor, the word 'flourishes' induces in the reader the mental image of fauna, causing a cognitive dissonance that could easily be avoided by reformulating the previous apothegm.

144 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5072 13:41

That's it. If I see that "cognitive dissonance" word one more time, I'm gonna scream. Cognitive dissonance did not arise because people experience dissonance between conflicting cognitions; rather, it surfaced when people saw their actions as conflicting with their self-concept. In the Festinger and Carlsmith study, Aronson would interpret the dissonance as between "I am an honest person" and "I lied to some one about finding a task interesting". Thus, according to Aronson, people would not experience dissonance in this situation if their self-concept involved perception of the self as a liar. Do you get it now?

145 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5072 17:10

Rather than correcting a minor nuance, >>144's post seems to be calling into question the entire basis of >>143's.

146 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5072 18:18

>post seems

I would like a rewording of this. It sounds too "militaristic".

147 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5072 18:36

What's with the scare quotes around "militaristic"?

148 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5072 20:25

>>147 meant to post in the solve the question above thread rather than the correct minor nuances of the previous post without regard for context thread.

149 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5072 22:50

>>148
I telics, meh.

150 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5072 22:52

>>149
This is not a sentence, why did you type it?

151 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5073 00:03

The kopipe refers to another to another post as being 'said'. I see no reason to switch the verb with 'type'.

152 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5073 00:05

>to another to another

Meh.

153 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5073 00:10

>>152 unnecessarily punctuated a brainfart.

154 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5073 02:50

>>153 dictated the correct punctuation of an ON-A-MON-A-PEE-UH.

155 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5073 12:18

>>154 doesn't make sense.

156 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5073 16:52

>>155 stated the obvious, without regard for conciseness. A more appropriate response would have been "STFU n00b".

157 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5073 17:01

>>156 could have just said

>>STFU n00b
>Fixed.

instead of going into the business of typing a very long line that is hard to read on wide screen LCD monitors especially the newer ones that have zero dead pixel guarantee.

158 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5073 17:16

>instead of going
>into the business
>of typing a very
>long line that
>is hard to
>read on wide
>screen LCD
>monitors especially
>the newer ones
>that have zero
>dead pixel
>guarantee.

Fixed >>157 for people browsing with a cell phone.

159 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5073 17:18

>cell phone.

Considering they are called mobile phones in some countries, a more general description could be given as "Mobile Device" as not only phones can browse the internet.

160 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5073 17:36

>interbutt

Fixed.

161 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5073 17:54

>Fix'd

Fixed

162 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5073 19:18

>Fixed.

Fixed.

163 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5073 20:57

>>162
Lies by telling he fixed it without fixing anything.

164 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5073 21:07

>>163 would look much better in bold.

165 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5073 21:32

>>164 should know that everything would look better in bold.

166 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5073 22:01

>>165 forgets that some things are better off italicized.

167 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5073 23:22

>>166 forgets that italicization is pretty much the same thing as underlining, and therefore, should've said, "italicized/underlined".

168 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5073 23:42

>>167 is ignorant to the fact that while underlining and italics have the same purpose in punctuation, italics look much better.

169 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5074 02:53

>>167,168 neglect to consider that underlined text calls attention to the statement while still being readable and unobtrusive.

170 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5076 21:48

>>169 makes me want to click his text, he should know that on the Internet underlined text should be a link.

171 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5076 22:14

>>170 should have stuck "'s protocol" somewhere in his tirade.

172 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5076 22:19

>>171 could have been more specific.

173 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5077 11:42

>>172 is a panda.

174 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5077 12:49

>>173 should be more precise: is he referring to Ailuropoda melanoleuca or Ailurus fulgens?

175 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5077 15:38

>>174 exemplifies this horrible tendency of the elitist superstructure to subcategorize everything. Flatter taxonomies would allow people of all levels of expertise in Pandas to share a common lexicon.

176 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5077 18:20

>common lexicon

Just doesn't sound very PC. Granted we have problems with illegal immigrants, but come on, don't bring that shit here. Mexicans are still not very common.

177 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5077 19:30

The first sentence of >>176 is incomplete, as it lacks a subject.

178 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5077 20:37

>>177 "That" is the implied subject.

179 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5077 21:10

>>178 "This"(Your statement) makes no sense.

180 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5077 23:23

>>179 is gay

181 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5077 23:32

>>181 did not correct minor nuances of the previous post without regard for context.

182 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5077 23:33

>>181 incorrectly linked his own post instead of >>180.

183 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5078 01:04

>>182's correction lacks chutzpa.

184 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5078 11:18

>chutzpa

185 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5078 11:59

>>185 failed to include the full stop in their quote.

186 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5078 12:00

>>184 failed to include the full stop in their quote.

187 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5078 13:27

>>186 can only think in terms of full sentences, denying words the right to be considered as independent entities. This is the sort of intellectual terrorism that keeps the global level of dialectical proficiency so low.

188 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5078 19:28

>>187 Uses big words to veil the fact that he dropped out of highschool.

189 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5078 19:32

>dropped

>>188 obviously wants to direct this conversation away from global warming.

190 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5078 22:24

>>189 used outdated terminology. Global warming? Really, how descriptive is that? Try climate change.

191 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5079 00:15

>>190, please avoid such "politically correct" terms in attempt to give them a positive spin. They only serve to impede understanding of the issues at hand, and to the linguistically proficient, decrease your credibility by associating a partisan agenda to your statements.

192 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5079 00:23

>>191 It's not good to put politically correct in quotes, it makes it look like PC is a disgusting, nasty, mind-bending, numb-inducing propaganda tool of the Dark Side. It may be all true, but a chronicler needs to look impartial.

193 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5079 03:16

>>192 needs to get intimate with the semi-colon.

194 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5079 05:31

>>193 overhyphenates. Semicolon is unpunctuated.

195 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5079 15:57

>>194 should have put "semicolon" in quotation marks.

196 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5079 16:04

>>195 should have said "inside" rather than "in".

197 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5079 17:42

>>196 is a noob @ the internets.

I use linux not because I hate microsoft (believe me, I do, but that's not why), not because I want to be a geek (I am), but because it fits my style. It's so much easier to accomplish things when you have the power of *nix commandline goodies ala GNU tools, etc. As well, I don't have to spend time searching for cracks and shit because /everything/ I use is free and I can build it from source if I need to.

Not only that, but anything I don't like, I can crack open and change, usually without too much difficulty. Linux: The OS is /yours/.

Get the fuck out, all of you. @ OP, unrar-free might work, as well as install rar and using rar x filename. (rar might be in multiverse repos, you should have those enabled anyway)

198 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5079 18:05

For those of you that DO have children, did you wonder what kind of parent you would turn out to be? Do you think you succeeded? Do you think your children reflect the values that you wanted to and continue to teach them? Did you want to raise your children like your parents raised you?

And for those of you that do NOT have children, do you ever wonder what kind of parent you'll be? Do you have a plan? Do you know certain things that you absolutely want to instill in your children and things that are not as important? Do you think you'll be successful? Do you want to raise your children the way your parents raised you?

And that's why, you, you should no use the word fuck.

199 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5079 19:08

>>198 fuck that

200 Name: ⊂二二二( ^ω^)二二二⊃ : 1993-09-5079 19:13

>>199 needed more punctuation, capitalisation, and possibly also line breaks.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.