In actuality, >>0 should be a link to http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1182180250/64.
>it lacks a subject
I started this post to just nitpick the poster above. After studying his post I realized that he has said something very pertinent to this board. So I won't say anything.
> So I won't say anything.
Technically, three complete sentences have already been communicated at this point.
>>206 missed a comma. It should read like this:
"it was TWO, fucker, TWO"
>>210 should have said quote, ellipsis, unquote, for blind people using talking software to read this.
to copy -> at copying
Gerund form is the correct usage.
Your ASCII arrow would be better expressed with a Unicode character such as "→" (U+21E8, RIGHTWARDS ARROW).
>>220
"with a Unicode character" U+21E8 "with an Unicode character"
"An Unicode"? I suppose you would also say that a woman has "an uterus".
Become an hero.
I won't allow your pathetic attempt at polarizing the debate by making casual feminist statements in this inappropriate context. People like you who try to make affirmative statements about every popular cause piss me off to no end.
>>223, you are regarding the previous poster's context, rather than correcting minor nuances. Nevertheless, changing the repeated use of "statements" to a synonym would make your second sentence more effective.
>>228's use of "BBS" is verging on the anachronistic
>>230, you should punctuate your sentence to indicate the thought has been completely transcribed. At present, it looks like you accidentally submitted the form in the middle of typing.
>>231 ironically included punctuation, but neglected to fully complete the thought beforehand, leaving his post readable but still moderately awkward.
>>232 has a split infinitive. Although this is not technically against any hard-set rules of English grammar, it is frowned upon by most style guides.
>>233 I'd've written "it's" rather than "it is" if I were you.
>>234
I'd've?
English language professors would have a field day with that.
>>235
Seriously, though, professors are one silly bunch.
>>236
Didn't correct anything in the previous post, but rather commented on it.
(´^ิω＾ิ)
>>238
Appears in many threads, but fails to contribute to any of those threads.
>>239 failed to realize that (´^ิω＾ิ) was merely being true to his nature.
>>240 failed to use a gender-neutral pronoun. (´^ิω＾ิ) could, in fact, be female, or neither, or both.
>>241 ignores that (´^ิω＾ิ) is actually called Left Parenthesis Acute Accent Circumflex Accent Combining Circumflex Accent Greek Small Letter Omega Fullwidth Circumflex Accent Combining Circumflex Accent Right Parenthesis.
>>242 doesn't seem to realize that no one cares what (´^ิω＾ิ) is called, because he is nothing more than an annoying retarded grandpa.
(´^ิω＾ิ) DddUUuUrRrrrRrR >>243 ID A FIG TAT GUTM. MIP WIS SOO KLEVRET
>>246 communicated a word and/or suffix not that I can not find in any standard English dictionary which raises the question of why this word was used at all.
>>249 probably should have used "fewer", unless he meant the commas should have been smaller.
>>250 incorrectly placed the comma on the outside of the quotation mark.
>>251 is using American spelling rules. In British English for instance, punctuation is only placed within quotation marks if it is part of what is being quoted or referred to.
>>252 is a dirty limey and doesn't know how to speak his own language.
>>253 should have used all caps to emphasise his redneck roots.
>>254's use of "caps" in place of "capitals" somewhat undermines their point.
>>256 used no capital letters at all, even when beginning a new sentence.
>>257 Used no capital letters at all, even when beginning a new sentence.
>>259 spelled "realize" wrong.
>>259's usage of "realise" instead of "realize" on such an international message board reeks of nationalism.
>>261's faulty cache settings are a significant hindrance to signal-to-noise ratio of this debate.
>>262 "Debate"? When a teacher corrects the spelling errors of his student, he's not debating.
I'll leave as an exercise to the reader to find the proper wording.
>>263 used the transitive verb "leave" without supplying a direct object.
>>264 neglected to mention that he is a Panda and a registered sex offender.
>>265 incorrectly posted in the correcting minor nuances without regard for context thread rather than the previous post is a panda thread.
>>266 incorrectly regarded overall thread context in his correction of a minor nuance. And is a Panda.
>>267 started a new sentence for something which should have been a dependent clause.
>>268 is not welcome here for the BUUN is not with him.
>>270 doesn't happen to realize that human freedom is a privilege, not a right. Also, he doesn't realize Default is a bourgeoisie 3rd rate "grunge" band everyone has forgotten.