it is in title...
is difference existing
>>21-22
You have gotten me fired from my job at Liberty University!
I hope you're happy!
If I got fired from there, I'd be happy too.
And I'd make a point of defacing that fucking monogram in the process of leaving.
Hey look! Fox News takes on 4chan.... and gets it all wrong...
or not... hehe, Fox... ^_^
"Truly Epic Lulz..."
What is with 4chan anyway, is it just because of the images? We always said that if we attracted a larger group we'd have higher quality content. Well they've got the numbers, but all they attract are a bunch of juvenile idiots. Maybe it's cause American children are easily affected by pr0ns.
>>26
Words cannot express how much I don't care that you script kiddies finally got the attention you so desperately yearn for.
4chan, specifically /b/, attracts a bunch of juvenile idiots because it's targetted at juvenile idiots. No matter what the owners / founders originally had planned, that's how it turned out.
Also, I think 4-ch is actually quite well off concerning the good post / stupid post ratio. More posters means more quality posts, sure, but it also means more crap posts. The relative amount will stay about the same.
The only thing that's worrying me a bit right now is how DQN is bleeding over into general. That which is DQN, should stay in DQN.
Yeah, if we're not careful we'll suffer the same fate.
Their text boards are real crap. Some of the image boards are actually passable.
It's a pity, there's no true, 2ch-like text culture on 4chan.
> there's no true, 2ch-like text culture on 4chan.
The complete lack of moderation of it's text boards removes any possibility of such.
It's because all the threads are about Corea instead nida.
4chan: A chaotic orgy of memes, porn, and trolls with the occasional raid thrown in.
4channel: A slower, quieter (read: boring) website for people into Japanese popular culture but are put off by the faster-paced and generally more obscene posters at 4chan.
It's a matter of personal preference, really, though I personally prefer 4chan simply because something's always happening (though it's not always good).
Also, as a general rule of Internet forums, the larger the forum, the more idiots it attracts. That's why small, elitist forums with a more tight-knit community generally are nicer and more intelligent than, say, Gaia Online, a forum that by and large exceeds Something Awful and 4chan in terms of sheer size but also contains a staggering amount of idiots.
tl;dr If you don't want your precious internet forum to be overrun by idiots, keep it a secret.
i no a sekrit webpage ololo
Gaia is pure faggotry. You can kill off (in RL) 80% of the Gaiafags and not ONE person would cry.
We really need some sort of new Image Board for the Gaiafucks. I'm serious; those fuckers are pouring into 4chan like fat people if the world was covered in butter.
>>31
hey, i just had this crazy idea: things can be cool even if they're not inspired by japan
its a little hard to swallow at first, but i'm sure you can understand it
4chan doesn't exist, unless you like seeing the same thread spammed in every discussion board, and nothing but crap posted all over the imageboards.
4-ch has higher quality trolling and AA comedy. That is to say, it has any amount of it which is of course greater than a complete lack thereof, goodnight.
>>41
hey, i just had this crazy idea: Reading Comprehension 101
its a little hard to swallow at first, but you can just spit it out if you don't like the taste
4-ch is better in the same way that a plane crash that kills 50 people is better than a plane crash that kills 51 people.
4chan: I go there to lurk for stupid lulz, and porn. Also, the /tv/ board there rules and the oekaki is good for killing time.
4-ch: It's kinda boring here, but you guys are more approachable and, at times, have interesting things to say. Also, better trolls (How can you troll 4chan, anyway?).
Gaia: Used to be kinda cool, now I only go there to dress up my avatar and laugh at the Life Issues forum. I don't see why everyone hates it so much.