[GEEK] My options [KINDA LAME] (49)

1 Name: (´-`).。oO(おっぱい (.Y.) ) : 2005-11-11 03:44 ID:lfTlp+rj

I am a part-time high school student. I go to the local college for some classes. There are a few girls I know from either of these schools and could potentially 2GET.

Anyways, here are my options:

1) Quiet, short-haired brunette girl. Attraction: She wrote her Eng Comp essay for the legalization of pot. She can't be that bad! Also very cute. Drawback: I don't know much about her or talk to her much.
Difficulty: 4/5

2) Long-haired brunette, cute personality, dumb as a fucking brick, 'chaste until marriage'. Attraction: Well, she obviously likes me... Drawback: Read last phrase in description.
Difficulty: 0/5

3) Short-haired blonde girl from my gym class. Attraction: Cute, sexy, young, wants my cock. Drawback: Enjoy your aids. Also likely stupid.
Difficulty: 1/5

4) Snippy short-haired brunette girl. Attraction: Pretty cute, forceful personality. Drawback: Same as #1; as a matter of fact, they're friends.
Difficulty: 3/5

CAST YOUR VOTES

2 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-11 04:09 ID:+yf+TqJK

4 sounds interesting.

3 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-11 05:01 ID:CK+B3+NQ

It depends on your own personality. Do you think you could "keep up" with a snippy type like #4? I would go for #1 if I wasn't shy myself.

Do any of them wear glasses? :3

4 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-11 05:22 ID:EPsKtlhk

Meh. Ditzy chicks are fun but they make lousy long-term partners. Ditto with potheads. From the little info you've provided, I'd guess #4. Really, though, this is the kind of decision you should be making yourself...

5 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-11 05:52 ID:inXTfMb7

#4 I guess. I'd like #1 if she wasn't a dumbfuck pothead. #2 is out of the question, there's no way you want to go out with a stupid fuck unless you just want a lay - which is dumb, and you won't get from #2 anyway. #3 is out of the question for the same reason as #2, why bother. #4 is the only real option, but I dislike forceful personalities on anyone - with serious relationships especially, I'd like everything to be completly mutual.

I would take a wait and see attitude. Something better will probably pop up.

6 Name: Gordy : 2005-11-11 06:24 ID:dbl60x+C

Why don't you try talking to any of them? Maybe the ones you think are stupid aren't as dumb as you think they are. And #1 probably isn't a pothead, unless you know something we don't.

7 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-12 06:35 ID:fTC63JwV

If #1 wrote a coherent essay on drug legalization, she's probably not a pothead.
Get to know #1 and #4 better, forget about #2 and #3.

8 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-12 07:15 ID:vqHnbUHl

I'd go for 2. Case in point - if you can still like her without the under-the-sheet playing around, you'd still like her in 10 or 20 years time...

I guess the question is really what you want out of this relationship...

:)

9 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-13 00:33 ID:fTC63JwV

>>8
'Dumb as a brick' put me off a lot more than 'chaste until marriage'.

10 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-13 03:42 ID:CK+B3+NQ

So you pick one yet?

11 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-13 04:19 ID:Heaven

"chaste until marriage" sort of seems to contradict "Dumb as a brick."

At least she obviously isn't gooing around sleeping with a lot of people. So... how/what sort of dumb is she? Requesting more etails.

1 and 4 are probably the best. And personally, I would only settle for the best. :p

Stay far away from 3.

12 Name: (´-`).。oO(おっぱい (.Y.) ) : 2005-11-13 17:40 ID:lfTlp+rj

I'm probably going to go for #1.
She always wears Rolling Stones t-shirts, and my dad just got tickets to a U2 concert (which I like), so I'll probably ask her when I actually get around to talking to her. She isn't a "dumbfuck pothead" either -- 1 and 4 are both from my college classes. βακα..._〆(゚▽゚*)

>>3 #4 does, I think. Mostly contacts, tho :P
>>4 I agree on the 'ditzy sucks' part. My first g/f was a complete moron, but was loose enough (I was 14 at the time, I had no fucking clue) to not make a difference. Left in 2 months, though ┐(´ー`)┌

Thanks for the responses, I love 4ch!
゜・:,。★\('ー')♪才×〒"├¬♪('ー')/★,。・:・゜

13 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-14 17:34 ID:kzH9nWaK

Go for #1 and tell us the details of your magical and mystical journey of love!

14 Name: (´-`).。oO(おっぱい (. Y .) ) : 2005-11-14 18:17 ID:ajSNWKjg

(:D)| ̄|_

15 Name: MJP!UyIEvIA9Mg : 2005-11-14 22:25 ID:rua2M0Ce

1)GET

The purpose of dating is to find out more about someone and have fun in the process.

16 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-15 05:04 ID:nIUaBJKz

Try them all. Just save your game early and go down each girl's scenario, then reload after you've won one of them over.

17 Name: (´-`).。oO(おっぱい (. Y .) ) : 2005-11-15 12:11 ID:lfTlp+rj

>>16
Ironically, seeing as only two of them know each other, this may be possible...

However, I'm not going back to the high school after this semester, so #2-3 won't be readily available :/

Sidenote: I'm asking #1 to the concert today, if she's at school today (absent yesterday :P)
Wish me luck! ヽ(´ー`)ノ(ノ´ー`)ノ(ノ´ー)ノ(ノ´)ヽ(   )ノヽ(ー`ヽ)ヽ(´ー`ヽ)ヽ(´ー`)ノ

18 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-15 12:38 ID:+yf+TqJK

>>17

Go for it dood!

19 Name: MJP!UyIEvIA9Mg : 2005-11-15 13:43 ID:QpG3fIEg

>>17

Remember: when in doubt, choose C) Stick it in.

Good luck!

20 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-15 13:46 ID:CK+B3+NQ

Good luck! And please, details!

21 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-16 06:17 ID:fTC63JwV

>>11
Depends on why she's doing it. There's no contradiction between "dumb as a brick" and "chaste until marriage for religious reasons". In fact, I'd say you can't have the second without the first.

22 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-16 10:03 ID:wvUxkDo1

>>17

Good luck dude..

23 Name: (´-`).。oO(おっぱい (. Y .) ) : 2005-11-16 11:55 ID:lfTlp+rj

She wasn't there yesterday, or the day before. I'm thinking she's sick, so unless she's here today (we .are. turning in a paper) I guess I'll just sell the tickets (don't care enough to go myself).

>>21
I live in Georgia. Evangelism is taken for granted. And your statement is, IMHO, absolutely true.

24 Name: (´-`).。oO(おっぱい (. Y .) ) : 2005-11-17 00:40 ID:Heaven

She wasn't here today, either. Tickets are gone :P
I still want to ask her out, but she wouldn't want to go after being really sick. Oh well...

25 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-22 18:03 ID:HU/b27Zm

>>24

spoilers:

she doesn't want to go with you.

26 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-22 22:47 ID:CK+B3+NQ

>>24
Send her a get well card?

27 Name: (´-`).。oO(おっぱい (. Y .) ) : 2005-11-24 06:43 ID:lfTlp+rj

>>25
Hahhah, irrelevant.

>>26
She was here the day before yesterday. I assume she was sick, but I never got to talk to her, so I'm not sure. Considering the lack of conversation we have, I'm not sure a card would have worked.

UPDATE: One of my friends will introduce me to this http://img15.imgspot.com/?u=/u/05/327/01/caitlin31132813935.jpg girl soon enough. He's teh ghey, so my runway's clear :D

28 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-24 20:53 ID:9ADmmUGK

Is that his ex-boyfriend?

29 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-25 19:21 ID:4D95qsic

>>27

She's not bad looking, but she might put the beatdown on your ass if she finds out that you posted the picture on some random forum in this context.

30 Name: (´-`).。oO(おっぱい (. Y .) ) : 2005-11-26 00:40 ID:lfTlp+rj

>>28
Uh, no..

>>29
┐(´ー`)┌ whatever lol

31 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-26 06:14 ID:OD2LhsJh

Any results yet?

32 Name: (´-`).。oO(おっぱい (. Y .) ) : 2005-11-26 22:01 ID:Heaven

Nah, all quiet on this front
I haven't actually organized anything yet; I'm not sure how often he talks to her, since they don't go to the same school (´-` ;)

33 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-28 18:15 ID:avMy7tQQ

spoiler: none of them want you

lol

anyone who would categorize, narrow a person down that much, and make it seem like some game .. need to open your eyes :p

34 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-11-28 19:42 ID:tPhsgRMv

>>33

no, rather stop trolling

35 Name: (´-`).。oO(おっぱい (. Y .) ) : 2005-11-29 18:25 ID:Heaven

>>33
Yeah, because narrowing down my choices is a dead-fucking rip from dating sims games, right?
Just like deciding what you should major in based on your skills is like RPGs amirite?

36 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-12-03 09:43 ID:avMy7tQQ

>>35

hm, no actually .. i wasn't referring to RPGs of any kind .. o.O

rather, your lack of respect for these women by placing your "options" as you so lovingly call them into a checklist each with a "difficulty" rating ..

yup .. she sure "wants your cock" alright .. eyeroll

seriously, you are in high school .. try to reform yourself now before you become one of those disgusting self-centered college guys that no girl with less than 27 venereal diseases would even consider touching :p it really isn't attractive

37 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-12-03 21:12 ID:Heaven

They're numbered in lieu of using names. It's not a checklist.

38 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-12-04 18:29 ID:VTds1qYk

>>36
Don't tell guys to reform. The more scummy guys there are out there, the better I (as a nice guy) look in the eyes of the nice girls.

39 Name: Secret Admirer : 2005-12-04 21:24 ID:Heaven

All high school relationships are phony garbage. Don't bother.

40 Name: (´-`).。oO(おっぱい (. Y .) ) : 2005-12-05 01:51 ID:lfTlp+rj

I'm probably not going to bother with any for now. Motivation is just too lacking.

>>36: I'm not objectifying these girls at all, except for the stupidest and sluttiest one. She deserves objectification because she led herself there, and continues to act that way. I never actually mentioned this, but the reason that she is interested in me at all is because I, as a senior, can take her to the prom. That's essentially a blank check for sex.

I avoid calling women sluts because men are no less guilty, and because sex is nothing more than pleasure. In this case, though, the girl is merely offering herself in exchange for going to the prom -- not like this must be the case, but I see it as most likely true. In effect, choosing her would be little more than buying a service.

Besides, this thread is meant to be a realistic view of a, I suppose, typical male mind trying to work a problem out. Machiavelli never tried to impress anyone, he just told it like it was. So do I.

Oh, and before I forget, I was joking about the "wants my cock" part. However, that isn't in conflict with anything I've said so far.

>>38 LOL, RIGHT. Women can write out lists longer than their shopping receipts about the traits of a perfect man, but then they marry some loser who loves and leaves. Nice guys finish last, my son. I just don't have the heart to take advantage of women and act like an ass.

>>39 I've seen only a few relationships that weren't, but that's mostly a matter of maturity. The girls I'd most want to go out with would be mature enough, I think, to make it worthwhile.

41 Name: :D :D :D : 2006-01-09 19:54 ID:XvVjYfG5

#1 cause she's the hardest :P

and hey maybe she puts out ;)

42 Name: Secret Admirer : 2006-01-09 23:35 ID:Heaven

Wait until you're out of HS for a relationship. For now, just get a vagina to fuck.

43 Name: Secret Admirer : 2006-01-10 00:53 ID:NUmAwVqC

(5) sock in a cardboard toiletpaper roll

lol man, you peoples problems are so easy ^_^

44 Name: Secret Admirer : 2006-01-10 00:54 ID:NUmAwVqC

but seriously, all kiddings aside, (4)

45 Name: \_\ : 2006-01-11 05:36 ID:V9Id8NHR

3 or 4

46 Name: Secret Admirer : 2006-01-13 03:17 ID:oMGJwhex

You take No. 4, and send me No. 1 via mail. ;-)

47 Name: Secret Admirer : 2007-09-27 13:37 ID:IrDqxP+y

Lame!!

48 Name: Secret Admirer : 2007-10-06 18:36 ID:PtQOC3r9

stay the fuck away from #1

girls who are into heavily interested in drugs = batshit insane w/ trust issues at their core in my experiences

49 Name: Secret Admirer : 2007-10-06 23:03 ID:ERz2ZmaK

I dunno if I would equate pot with a heavy interest in drugs though, pot is pretty mild.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.