Do you believe (7)

1 Name: Secret Admirer : 2006-09-17 15:31 ID:a2Ifq2Sh

in life after love, after love, after love?

2 Name: Secret Admirer : 2006-09-17 16:44 ID:pFP6e+Dl

I can feel something inside me say

3 Name: Secret Admirer : 2006-09-17 18:15 ID:sfRwOH1h

I really dont think its gay enough, oh

4 Name: Secret Admirer : 2006-09-18 11:39 ID:7fTNPaVe

CHER?

5 Name: Anonymous : 2006-09-18 13:14 ID:0jVjbgLL

NO U

6 Name: Secret Admirer : 2006-09-26 18:02 ID:efWN8qgD

>>1
Yes. If you can't have a life in "spite of" being in love, you have no business being in love. Love is very important, but the love of a partner (as opposed to friends and family) is not vital, merely a very pleasant bonus that makes life better.
Next question.

7 Name: Serverin von Kusiemski : 2006-09-26 20:57 ID:s32zfYi1

I've always found the idea of "me and my lover against the world" thing to be incredibly selfish and stupid. If you don't have any higher aspirations than just being with your lover, you are as selfish as the person who only thinks for themselves. As an activist/revolutionary who is seeing someone right now, I can firmly say that the people of the world and my political causes mean far more to me than my lover... and I am glad she understands that, because if she didn't, we'd be totally incompatible.

I see so many people get sucked into each other and only live for each other, and they become utter assholes to everyone else, and then they end up having having extremely destructive breakups... it's pathetic.

This thread has been closed. You cannot post in this thread any longer.