>>29
It seems somebody here has been subjected to a lobotomy.

You truly astound me.
That is why I shall deconstruct your argument completely, line by line. Of course this is no great thing as you seem to be an idiot.

>Homosexual men are more masculine than a man that's intimidated by a women (and also more desirable to the opposite sex).

I am afraid you still have not defined what 'masculinity' is, and why it is desirable.

>It doesn't mean he's not a man or not masculine, just that the man that takes the lead is more masculine than he.

Again you fail to define what exactly it means to be masculine, etc., etc.

>Same reason feminists aren't feminine.

What is it to be feminine? Why can;t someone who holds feminist views be feminine? I don't see the two as mutually exclusive. In fact, this statement is completely ridiculous.

>Most men don't want to be castrated.

I'm afraid I don't see what this has to do with anything at all.

>We want a submissive women who wears a dress, cooks the steak we've provided, spreads her legs, and make us feel like men.

You seem to have substituted 'we' for 'I'. Why do activities that include wearing a dress, cooking steaks, spreading your legs (?), and making someone feel a certain way define a woman? I am afraid you seem to have completely lost your head in this little passage and you will have to be much more explicit in your meaning. So tell me why these things define a woman, and are desirable?

>Yeah, yeah. Fuck me.

My respect for you dropped even further, or rather it might have were that at all possible, which it wasn't after I read the first few lines of your dribble.

>I'm a terrible human being for playing fast and loose with the horrible truth that we're all cruel animals.

You have not at all validated a thing you have said. Why is what you say 'the truth' (strong words)? Would you care to validate your numerous and ridiculous claims? They must have a basis in reason and logic and you must show your reasoning. Who are you, for instance, to make claims about the general disposition of all men (cruel animals)?

>If it'll keep your feelings from being hurt, we can say masculinity is the presence of male genitalia or a Y chromosome.

So if masculinity is the presence of male genitalia and/or a Y chromosome, why are not all men masculine, and thus desirable, according to your reasoning? Unless that is not what you meant.

>But then FtM transsexuals are offended, and maybe those of us with a micropenis.

Again, irrelevant. Were you frequently visiting the academic help department in the university you attended, or perhaps you didn't qualify?

>You want to be a winner? Cross the finish line first. That participant ribbon is crap and we all know it.

What is this rot? Has eloquence of speech and general refinement been discounted? Is idiocy now the prime characteristic that is desirable?

Also, I am a male, you nitwit.