>I never asked what you could do, I asked for your evidence now. We will wait to compare until you produce it.
I, as in >>66, actually meant that like >>70 understood it, but well, if you feel like it you can look up the history of mathematics in any encyclopedia that is worth it's money. IIRC the earliest people started counting was about 70.000 BC, a little while before we used tools. This is shown by scratches which archeologists have discovered on the walls of the Blombos cave.
>No. Optical, yes, but that is certainly not the same as one’s senses fooling them “all the time.”
You serious? Alriiight, If you really want to play dumb, because quite frankly, I think you already know all this:
There, one for each sense.
>Speak into the microphone.
Me are and you is smart, also known as: Sorry, I'm not a native english speaker, so I don't understand what this means, but I guess this is some kind of sarcastic remark. Anyways, I guess that's basically admitting that I was right.
