You said that the laws of mathematics were ‘agreed upon.’ I said ‘I must have missed the meeting.’ You said “you did, it happened a few thousand years ago.” I asked for your evidence of this meeting and you refer me to a book, which you have faith in, which says people started counting a long time ago. Thing is, I never asked that, I asked for your evidence about the meeting where the laws of mathematics were agreed upon.” Still waiting for that (not holding my breath though).
>You serious? Alriiight, If you really want to play dumb, because quite frankly, I think you already know all this:
Maybe you should read your posts, and my answers before you respond. I said that I have seen ‘Optical’ illusions, not this ‘otical’ illusion you referred to. I also said that the claim was that our senses deceive us ‘ALL THE TIME,’ is not proven by a few optical illusions. Surely you are not saying that EVERYTHING is an optical illusion?!?
>Sorry, I'm not a native english speaker, so I don't understand what this means
It means, if you want to say that 2 things plus 2 things could equal 5 things, that I want you to say it so everyone can hear. A ‘microphone’ is used to amplify one’s voice.