In actuality, >>0 should be a link to http://4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1182180250/64.
>>101 is under the mistaken impression that this board has readers.
>>105 etou... I really so don't understand the meaning of including two question marks at the end of a sentence.
> I really so don't
Even if that "so" was just an interjection, it's still grammatically incorrect. Unless of course you speak the Southern California English dialect.
>>107 Is also making grammatical mistakes. The title would be "Southern Californian", because the adjective form of California is needed here to describe the kind of English dialect.
>>109 spelled capitalize with an 'S', which is the preferred method in Australian English and my own native dialect, but it still bugs me as a 'Z' is more phonetically and aesthetically pleasing.
>>110 used the tired slang/cliche "bugs me" which bugs me
>>111 neglected to include a closing punctuation mark, giving the impression that he's not yet finished with his critique.
>>113 fails to subscribe to the locally dominant meme that there are no girls on the internet.
>>115
You have attempted to construct a sentence out of a single word, yet every grammarian worth his salt knows that at least two words are required.
>>116
You is awfully familiar. Please use "This distinguished poster" from now on when referring to our person.
> You are awfully familiar.
> "You" is awfully familiar.
> [quote] That pronoun is overused and trite.
For your consideration, I have provided two corrections and a revision of dialectical superiority.
>>118
Correcting things? On the internet? In this day and age?
>>119 includes three question marks. However, he failed to ask a question, instead punctuating three sentence fragments.
There's no such thing as a question fragment.
The first sentence of >>123 is ambiguous, and should be reworded as "The second sentence of >>122 is ambiguous, and should be reworded as ">>121 would do well in the future to read more thoroughly the post he wants to be corrected" or similarly, to avoid misinterpretation." or similarly, to avoid misinterpretation.
>>124's nested double quotes have confused me eyes greatly and so I refuse to try and correct minor nuances of his post without regard for context.
>>125 thinks he is Yoda with his "me eyes". Yoda protip: Yoda Englishman is not.
Your grammatical correction of that kopipe was unappreciated and unnecessary. Also, shoot it until it dies.
>>128 I'm growing weary of those Japanese words used in English. Use something more talkative to English speakers, like "copypasta".
> copypasta
This is not an English word why did you say it
Loanwords have a heavy presence in most every language.
Speaking modern English is actually impossible if one refrained from using words taken from other languages.
The last two sentences of >>130 are logically related, so the line break between them is unnecessary.
>The last two sentences of >>130 are logically related, the line break between them is unnecessary.
Fixed.
(They are people who find people saying "so" distasteful.)
> Corrected minor nuances of the previous post without regard for context
Fixed.
> Removed the nutsack to prevent breeding and aggressive, vexatious behaviour in the neighbourhood.
Corrected.
>>134 what the fuck is a greater than sign doing in your post anyway?? If you want to quote quote unquote the post, just do so. We don't have the time to sift through your post and find what you actually mean.
>I am lazy.
Wasn't that what you meant?
>>137 you mean "meaned" right? Otherwise, I don't want to even consider your post.
>>138 stands on its own, and no amount of correction would be enough.
That comma was extraneous.
That was an unnecessarily trite thing to say.
Brevity is the soul of wit, and tediousness the limbs and outward flourishes.
While the words 'soul' and 'limbs' anthropomorphize the metaphor, the word 'flourishes' induces in the reader the mental image of fauna, causing a cognitive dissonance that could easily be avoided by reformulating the previous apothegm.
That's it. If I see that "cognitive dissonance" word one more time, I'm gonna scream. Cognitive dissonance did not arise because people experience dissonance between conflicting cognitions; rather, it surfaced when people saw their actions as conflicting with their self-concept. In the Festinger and Carlsmith study, Aronson would interpret the dissonance as between "I am an honest person" and "I lied to some one about finding a task interesting". Thus, according to Aronson, people would not experience dissonance in this situation if their self-concept involved perception of the self as a liar. Do you get it now?
>post seems
I would like a rewording of this. It sounds too "militaristic".
What's with the scare quotes around "militaristic"?
>>147 meant to post in the solve the question above thread rather than the correct minor nuances of the previous post without regard for context thread.
The kopipe refers to another to another post as being 'said'. I see no reason to switch the verb with 'type'.
>to another to another
Meh.
>>153 dictated the correct punctuation of an ON-A-MON-A-PEE-UH.
>>155 stated the obvious, without regard for conciseness. A more appropriate response would have been "STFU n00b".
>>156 could have just said
>>STFU n00b
>Fixed.
instead of going into the business of typing a very long line that is hard to read on wide screen LCD monitors especially the newer ones that have zero dead pixel guarantee.
>instead of going
>into the business
>of typing a very
>long line that
>is hard to
>read on wide
>screen LCD
>monitors especially
>the newer ones
>that have zero
>dead pixel
>guarantee.
Fixed >>157 for people browsing with a cell phone.
>cell phone.
Considering they are called mobile phones in some countries, a more general description could be given as "Mobile Device" as not only phones can browse the internet.
>interbutt
Fixed.
>Fix'd
Fixed
>Fixed.
Fixed.
>>162
Lies by telling he fixed it without fixing anything.
>>164 should know that everything would look better in bold.
>>165 forgets that some things are better off italicized.
>>166 forgets that italicization is pretty much the same thing as underlining, and therefore, should've said, "italicized/underlined".
>>167 is ignorant to the fact that while underlining and italics have the same purpose in punctuation, italics look much better.
>>169 makes me want to click his text, he should know that on the Internet underlined text should be a link.
>>170 should have stuck "'s protocol" somewhere in his tirade.
>>173 should be more precise: is he referring to Ailuropoda melanoleuca or Ailurus fulgens?
>>174 exemplifies this horrible tendency of the elitist superstructure to subcategorize everything. Flatter taxonomies would allow people of all levels of expertise in Pandas to share a common lexicon.
>common lexicon
Just doesn't sound very PC. Granted we have problems with illegal immigrants, but come on, don't bring that shit here. Mexicans are still not very common.
The first sentence of >>176 is incomplete, as it lacks a subject.
>>181 did not correct minor nuances of the previous post without regard for context.
>chutzpa
>>186 can only think in terms of full sentences, denying words the right to be considered as independent entities. This is the sort of intellectual terrorism that keeps the global level of dialectical proficiency so low.
>>187 Uses big words to veil the fact that he dropped out of highschool.
>dropped
>>188 obviously wants to direct this conversation away from global warming.
>>189 used outdated terminology. Global warming? Really, how descriptive is that? Try climate change.
>>190, please avoid such "politically correct" terms in attempt to give them a positive spin. They only serve to impede understanding of the issues at hand, and to the linguistically proficient, decrease your credibility by associating a partisan agenda to your statements.
>>191 It's not good to put politically correct in quotes, it makes it look like PC is a disgusting, nasty, mind-bending, numb-inducing propaganda tool of the Dark Side. It may be all true, but a chronicler needs to look impartial.
>>196 is a noob @ the internets.
I use linux not because I hate microsoft (believe me, I do, but that's not why), not because I want to be a geek (I am), but because it fits my style. It's so much easier to accomplish things when you have the power of *nix commandline goodies ala GNU tools, etc. As well, I don't have to spend time searching for cracks and shit because /everything/ I use is free and I can build it from source if I need to.
Not only that, but anything I don't like, I can crack open and change, usually without too much difficulty. Linux: The OS is /yours/.
Get the fuck out, all of you. @ OP, unrar-free might work, as well as install rar and using rar x filename. (rar might be in multiverse repos, you should have those enabled anyway)
For those of you that DO have children, did you wonder what kind of parent you would turn out to be? Do you think you succeeded? Do you think your children reflect the values that you wanted to and continue to teach them? Did you want to raise your children like your parents raised you?
And for those of you that do NOT have children, do you ever wonder what kind of parent you'll be? Do you have a plan? Do you know certain things that you absolutely want to instill in your children and things that are not as important? Do you think you'll be successful? Do you want to raise your children the way your parents raised you?
And that's why, you, you should no use the word fuck.